Email does not form attorney-client relationship
Airport Court Criminal Defense
Alhambra Criminal Defense
Beverly Hills Criminal Defense
Burbank Criminal Defense
Burbank Criminal Defense Attorney
El Monte Criminal Defense
Glendale Criminal Defense
Hollywood Criminal Defense
Los Angeles Criminal Defense
Hollywood Criminal Defense
Pasadena Criminal Defense
San Fernando Criminal Defense
Santa Clarita Criminal Defense
Van Nuys Criminal Defense
West Covina Criminal Defense

Case Results

Disclaimer: Any results portrayed in the Web site were obtained in specific cases which depended upon the unique facts and circumstances. Gregory Caplan does not guarantee specific results in any of his cases. Individual results will vary from case to case.

Client was charged with Petty Theft in Burbank Court . Mr. Caplan convinced prosecutor to dismiss case upon completion of Alternative Prosecution Program and community service.

Charge in Penal Code section 12020, Possession of Weapon case dismissed, after Mr. Caplan provided significant legal research to show that charge was incorrect.

Another client was charged with Possession of a Weapon at the Airport. Mr. Caplan convinced the prosecutor to dismiss the case after client completed a City Attorney Diversion Program and some community work.

Client had drug conviction 10+ years ago that was going to prevent him from becoming a citizen. Mr. Caplan had plea vacated and drug charge dismissed.

Mr. Caplan provided information to District Attorney in Glendale to convince them not to file charges against client for felony violations.

Client was charged with Possession of Marijuana. Mr. Caplan resolved case with dismissal of drug charge and plea to an infraction charge.

Mr. Caplan’s client was charged with Hit and Run. Mr. Caplan convinced prosecutor to dismiss misdemeanor charge upon payment of restitution and a plea to a no point infraction charge.

Another client was charged with Hit and Run. Mr. Caplan convinced prosecutor to allow a City Attorney Diversion Program where client could receive dismissal of case upon completion of required terms.

Van Nuys Court
had indicated that Client was to receive a year in jail for violations. Upon further consideration, court only sentenced Mr. Caplan’s client to 10 days in jail.

Mr. Caplan received an acquittal at trial for a client charged with “Zero Tolerance” alcohol violation. Client was able to save his driver’s license.

Client was charged with misdemeanor violations of Reckless Driving and Driving without a valid Driver’s License at Santa Clarita Courthouse. Mr. Caplan convinced prosecutor to dismiss misdemeanor violations for an infraction resolution.

Mr. Caplan convinced prosecutor to dismiss misdemeanor Driving on a Suspended License charge, a 2 point violation, for a plea to an infraction charge which counted as no points on client’s DMV record.

Client was charged with violation of Penal Code section 243(e)(1), Spousal Battery. Prosecutor eventually agreed to resolve case for infraction charge and dismissal of misdemeanor offense.

Client was arrested for felony drug violations. Mr. Caplan resolved case with a dismissal in Santa Clarita Court .

Client was charged with possession of concentrated cannabis, which could have impacted immigration rights. Mr. Caplan convinced prosecutor to dismiss the drug charge and allow client to plead to a Trespass charge, instead, preserving immigration rights of the client.

Client was charged with False Identification and False Seal (on ID Card). Mr. Caplan convinced the prosecutor to dismiss these charges. The prosecutor allowed a City Attorney Diversion Program where client was ultimately able to receive a dismissal of the entire case after completing community work.

Mr. Caplan’s client was suspected of Penal Code section 653(m) violation, Harassing Phone Calls. Mr. Caplan’s investigation provided to detective resulted in no filing of charges.

Client was charged with a theft violation at Santa Clarita Court , alleging over $100 stolen. Mr. Caplan convinced the prosecutor to give client an infraction violation of the same code.

Client was charged with violation of Penal Code section 484, Petty Theft in Torrance Court . Mr. Caplan convinced the prosecutor to dismiss the charge, and offer a much less serious charge, instead.

A client was accused of a $180 theft offense in Glendale Courthouse. Mr. Caplan convinced prosecutor to dismiss theft charge and allow plea to a less serious Trespass charge, instead.

Client was accused of Hit and Run in Los Angeles.  Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Gregory Caplan contacted California Highway Patrol and provided client’s account of incident. Case was not filed, thereafter.

Client had $50,000 warrant with three bench warrants on misdemeanor Driving without a Valid License. Mr. Caplan convinced court and prosecutor to recall warrant, reduce case to infraction violations, and reduce punishment to only a fine.

Mr. Caplan convinced the D.A. to dismiss a misdemeanor Reckless Driving charge, and reduce the charge to an infraction violation of Speeding

Client was charged with Petty Theft in Burbank Court. Mr. Caplan convinced prosecutor to dismiss case upon completion of Alternative Prosecution Program and community service.

Charge in Penal Code section 12020, Possession of Weapon case dismissed, after Mr. Caplan provided significant legal research to show that charge was incorrect.

Client had drug conviction 10+ years ago that was going to prevent him from becoming a citizen. Mr. Caplan had plea vacated and drug charge dismissed.

Mr. Caplan provided information to District Attorney in Glendale to convince them not to file charges against client for felony violations.

Client was charged with Possession of Marijuana. Mr. Caplan resolved case with dismissal of drug charge and plea to an infraction charge.

Van Nuys Court had indicated that Client was to receive a year in jail for violations. Upon further consideration, court only sentenced Mr. Caplan’s client to 10 days in jail.

Client was charged with violation of Penal Code section 242(e)(1), Spousal Battery. Prosecutor eventually agreed to resolve case for infraction charge and dismissal of misdemeanor offense.

Client was arrested for felony drug violations. Mr. Caplan resolved case with a dismissal in Santa Clarita Court.

Mr. Caplan’s client was suspected of Penal Code section 653(m) violation, Harassing Phone Calls. Mr. Caplan’s investigation provided to detective resulted in no filing of charges.

Client was charged with violation of Penal Code section 484, Petty Theft in Torrance Court. Mr. Caplan convinced the prosecutor to dismiss the charge, and offer a much less serious charge, instead.

Mr. Caplan convinced the Metropolitan Court Judge to dismiss a Vehicle Code section 14601.1, Driving on a Suspended License charge based on Constitutional violations.

Drug Charges | Theft Crimes | Suspended License | Hit & Run | Bench Warrants/Failure to Appear | Probation Violations
Burbank Criminal Defense | Santa Clarita Criminal Defense | San Fernando Criminal Defense |  Criminal Defense Attorneys
Van Nuys Criminal Defense El Monte Criminal Defense | Airport Court Criminal Defese | Glendale Criminal Defense
Alhambra Criminal DefenseBeverly Hills Criminal Defense | Pasadena Criminal Defense | West Covina Criminal Defense
Hollywood Criminal Defense | Los Angeles Criminal Defense | Malibu Criminal Defense | Burbank Criminal Defense Attorney

Attorney Web Design Los Angeles Criminal Defense Lawyers
Contact Los Angeles Criminal Defense attorney, Gregory Caplan
Legal Disclaimer
Privacy Policy
Administration